7.G Cube Ninjas!

Alignments to Content Standards: 7.G.A.3


Imagine you are a ninja that can slice solid objects straight through. You have a solid cube in front of you. You are curious about what 2-dimensional shapes are formed when you slice the cube. For example, if you make a slice through the center of the cube that is parallel to one of the faces, the cross section is a square: Cube_76f36c06164ec4f48c6cea8acefc1f89 Cube_middle_31aeb5fb18f9c62e8dcac7110ed2a21a For each of the following slices, (i) describe using precise mathematical language the shape of the cross section. (ii) draw a diagram showing the cross section of the cube. Cube_76f36c06164ec4f48c6cea8acefc1f89 a. A slice containing edge AC and edge EG b. A slice containing the vertices C, B, and G. C. A slice containing the vertex A, the midpoint of edge EG, and the midpoint of edge FG.

IM Commentary

The purpose of this task is to have students explore various cross sections of a cube and use precise language to describe the shape of the resulting faces. The drawings can be either 2- or 3-dimensional; some students may not have experience in drawing 3-D projections, in which case a 2-D drawing of the shape of the slice would be appropriate. The ability to visualize and understand the relationships between 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional objects is useful in many areas. Architects need to relate 3-dimensional buildings to 2-dimensional blueprints. Physicians need to relate 2-dimensional x-rays and MRI’s to 3-dimensional bodies. Engineers need to relate 2-dimensional schematics to 3-dimensional structures. Many people find such visualization challenging, often because they have had few opportunities to practice. Depending on the students, teachers may want to provide some tools to support this task. Clay can be made into cubes and sliced neatly with plastic knives, dental floss, or wire. Paper models can be cut and taped together. Isometric dot paper can also aid with drawings. There are free CAD programs such as Google sketchup that allow students to build and manipulate virtual models, but this goes beyond the intended purpose of this task. Note: We kept the language of the task simple and in line with the wording of the standard, referring to “slices” instead of “planar slices” or “planar cross-sections”. Some students may ask about or want to use non-planar slices. This is an opportunity to attend to the precision of the language, and indicate that in this task “slices” means “planar slices”. The use of non-planar slices changes the nature, complexity, and mathematics of this task.

The Standards for Mathematical Practice focus on the nature of the learning experiences by attending to the thinking processes and habits of mind that students need to develop in order to attain a deep and flexible understanding of mathematics. Certain tasks lend themselves to the demonstration of specific practices by students. The practices that are observable during exploration of a task depend on how instruction unfolds in the classroom. While it is possible that tasks may be connected to several practices, the commentary will spotlight one practice connection in depth. Possible secondary practice connections may be discussed but not in the same degree of detail.

Students will be engaged in Mathematical Practice Standard 5, “Use appropriate tools strategically,” by considering the available tools when solving this task and making sound decisions about which and when these tools might be helpful. At the same time, students recognize both the insights to be gained and the limitations of the tool/tools selected.  Being able to visualize 2-dimensional shapes within a 3-dimensional object may be very difficult for students. Making tools available will help students approach this task and give them valuable practice in visualizing these types of problems. Appropriate tools include: computer access, paper models, clay, and other tools that allow for the deconstruction of a cube.  Mathematical Practice Standard 6, attend to precision, is very integral to this task also. Precision in language is required as students describe the resulting shape of the slice.


a. A rectangle.


Comment: In Grade 7, students have not had the Pythagorean theorem, so they are not expected to determine that the rectangle has sides of 1 and $\sqrt{2}$. They should, however, note that the diagonal of a face is longer than the edge, hence the cross section is not a square.

b. An equilateral triangle.


Comment: Because the three sides of the cross-section are all the diagonals of the faces, they have the same length. As noted in part A, the students are not expected to determine the length to be $\sqrt{2}$, but they are expected to note that all three lengths are the same, hence the triangle is equilateral.

c. An irregular pentagon.


Comment: This one is by far the most challenging of the three. A key insight is to figure out where the plane intersects the edges CF and BE. Many people have a great deal of difficulty visualizing the shape. However, students using clay or paper models can figure it out. Although it is not expected for 7th grade students to be able to determine the exact coordinates (it ends up that the intersections are ⅔ the way up the edge), students can estimate that it is more than halfway, and be able to make an argument that the resulting shape has five sides and not all the sides have the same length, hence it is an irregular pentagon.

Martin says:

about 1 year

Whoa part C is super hard. But it makes sense that you can't go from A to the other edges without hitting the other 2 edges to make the pentagon. A bright 7th grader and I had trouble visualizing that one.

Martin says:

about 1 year

This is a great task. I just want more. Do we want students to generalize a limit on the number of sides possible of the cross section? Because in my 7th grade curriculum last year, CPM seemed to insinuate that. I believe you cannot have a face that has 1 more side then the amount of sides on the face with the largest amount of sides. Oof, that didn't sound too articulate.

Jacalyn Anderson says:

about 3 years

This task segues well into MACC.8.G.2 where the students will need to visualize a space diagonal. Students that have not had the opportunity to practice 3-D to 2-D representations would be at a disadvantage when incorporating mathematics into the visual-spatial world.

Kristin says:

almost 3 years

Thanks for your comment. It is great to hear ideas about strengths and weaknesses of tasks.