Unable to typeset | PDF Format | Error |
---|

# Minutes and Days

## Task

What time was it 2011 minutes after the beginning of January 1, 2011?

## IM Commentary

This task requires division of multi-digit numbers in the context of changing units and so illustrates 5.NBT.6 and 5.MD.1. In addition, the conversion problem requires two steps since 2011 minutes needs to be converted first to hours and minutes and then to days, hours, and minutes. In the solution, the division problem $2011 \div 60$ is handled in a way that aligns both with the usual division algorithm and with the scaffold method.

This task was adapted from problem #3 on the 2011 American Mathematics Competition 8 (AMC) Test. The responses to the multiple choice answers for the problem had the following distribution:

Choice | Answer | Percentage of Answers |

(A) | January 1 at 9:31pm | 20.08 |

(B) | January 1 at 11:51pm | 5.58 |

(C) | January 2 at 3:11am | 4.24 |

(D)* | January 2 at 9:31am | 65.24 |

(E) | January 2 at 6:01pm | 3.64 |

Omit | -- | 1.18 |

## Solution

January 1, 2011 begins at 12:00 AM. To find the time 2011 minutes later will require changing units since time is told in hours and minutes. There are 60 minutes in an hour so to see how many hours there are in 2011 minutes we can perform the division problem $2011 \div 60$. Since $30 \times 60 = 1800$, we can write $$ 2011 = 30 \times 60 + 211. $$ Next, there are three groups of $60$ in $211$, with a remainder of 31 so we get $$ 2011 = 30 \times 60 + 3 \times 60 + 31. $$ Using the distributive property this last expression is equivalent to $$ 2011 = (30 + 3) \times 60 + 31. $$ So 2011 minutes is the same as 33 hours and 31 minutes. Now 33 hours is one day and an additional 9 hours so this means that 2011 minutes is one day, nine hours, and thirty-one minutes. So 2011 minutes after the beginning of 2011 it is January 2 and it is 9:31 AM.

## Comments

Log in to comment## Bonnie Baggett says:

almost 3 yearsActually, Cam, in John VandeWalle's book "Teaching Student-Centered Mathematics" it says "Compounding the difficulty of division notation is the unfortunate phrase 'six goes into twenty-four'. This phrase carries little meaning about division, especially in connection with fair-sharing or partitioning context. the 'goes into' (or 'guzinta') terminology is simply engrained in adult parlance and has not been in textbooks for years. If you tend to use that phrase, it is probably a good time to consciously abandon it."

## Cam says:

over 2 yearsGood to know -- thanks for the reference! If you have it handy, does the book provide a preferred alternative? It's easy for the language to become particularly cumbersome in this area.

## Katia says:

about 3 years"Next, 60 goes into 211 three times." Isn't it more precise to say "How many groups of 60 are there in 211?" I thought we are moving away from the "gazinta" language. Thoughts?

## Cam says:

about 3 yearsHi KSpiess,

I agree your language is better, though I don't think there's much of a consensus that the "goes into" language is particularly wrong. Changes made -- thanks for the comment!